1. Supreme Court Refers Election Commission Appointment Law to Constitution Bench
Source: LiveLaw, SC Observer | Category: Indian Polity & Constitutional Law
What Happened?
The Supreme Court in Dr. Jaya Thakur vs Union of India witnessed a bench split on the constitutionality of the Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023. The matter has been referred to a Constitution Bench for definitive adjudication under Article 145(3), which requires a minimum of five judges for substantial questions of constitutional law.
Why is this IMPORTANT for CLAT?
- Article 324 confers independent superintendence of elections on the Election Commission; the 2023 Act altered the appointment mechanism from a purely judicial-led committee to one that includes the PM and a Cabinet minister
- This directly implicates the doctrine of constitutional independence of institutions and separation of powers — recurring CLAT passage themes
- Likely MCQ theme: composition of Constitution Benches, Article 145(3), who appoints Election Commissioners under the old vs new frameworks
Key Static Concepts to Link
- Article 324 — powers, superintendence, direction, and control of elections
- Article 145(3) — requirement for Constitution Bench (minimum 5 judges) for substantial constitutional questions
- Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act, 2023
- Article 324(2) — appointment of Election Commission members
- Anoop Baranwal vs Union of India (2023) — earlier SC judgment that mandated reformed appointments
Possible CLAT Questions
Q1. Which Article of the Indian Constitution establishes the Election Commission of India? A. Article 315 B. Article 324 C. Article 329 D. Article 243K Q2. A minimum of how many judges must constitute a bench to decide a 'substantial question of constitutional interpretation' under Article 145(3)? A. 3 B. 7 C. 5 D. 9 Q3. The Chief Election Commissioner and Other Election Commissioners (Appointment, Conditions of Service and Term of Office) Act was enacted in which year? A. 2019 B. 2021 C. 2022 D. 2023 Q4. Under Article 324(5), the Chief Election Commissioner can be removed from office in a manner similar to: A. Removal of a High Court judge B. Removal of a Supreme Court judge C. Removal of the President D. Removal of the Comptroller and Auditor General Q5. Which case, decided in 2023, first directed that the committee appointing Election Commissioners include the Leader of Opposition? A. S.R. Bommai vs Union of India B. Anoop Baranwal vs Union of India C. Kihoto Hollohan vs Zachillhu D. T.N. Seshan vs Union of India Answers: Q1-B, Q2-C, Q3-D, Q4-B, Q5-B
2. J&K Statehood Restoration: Constitutional Road Map
Source: Greater Kashmir, Tribune India | Category: Indian Polity & Constitutional Law
What Happened?
The Jammu & Kashmir Legislative Assembly has formally demanded restoration of full statehood, while legal experts and political leaders point out that the constitutional route requires Parliament to amend the J&K Reorganisation Act, 2019 using ordinary legislative power under Articles 3 and 4. The Supreme Court's 2023 verdict in In Re: Article 370 affirmed the validity of J&K's downgrade to a Union Territory but left the question of statehood restoration open, subject to a parliamentary pledge.
Why is this IMPORTANT for CLAT?
- Articles 3 and 4 govern reorganisation of States — a frequently tested constitutional provision
- The case highlights the distinction between a State and a Union Territory under the constitutional scheme (Articles 1, 246, 239, 239A, 239AA)
- Likely passage theme: parliamentary power to alter state boundaries, limits on federalism, Article 370 jurisprudence
Key Static Concepts to Link
- Article 3 — Parliament's power to form, alter, or reorganise States
- Article 4 — laws made under Articles 2 and 3 are not constitutional amendments under Article 368
- Article 370 (now inoperative) — special provisions for J&K
- J&K Reorganisation Act, 2019 — bifurcated J&K into two UTs: J&K and Ladakh
- In Re: Article 370 (2023) — SC upheld abrogation; directed elections to J&K assembly
Possible CLAT Questions
Q1. Which Article empowers Parliament to create a new State or alter boundaries of existing States? A. Article 2 B. Article 3 C. Article 4 D. Both A and B Q2. When J&K was reorganised in 2019, it was divided into: A. One State and one Union Territory B. Two Union Territories — J&K (with legislature) and Ladakh (without legislature) C. Two States D. A Union Territory and a Scheduled Area Q3. Under Article 4, a law passed under Articles 2 and 3 shall NOT be deemed to be an amendment of the Constitution under which Article? A. Article 13 B. Article 245 C. Article 368 D. Article 254 Q4. The J&K Reorganisation Act, 2019 was passed under which provision? A. Article 248 B. Article 3 read with Article 4 C. Article 370 alone D. Article 368 Q5. Which Constitutional Bench delivered the verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370? A. 3-judge bench B. 5-judge bench C. 7-judge bench D. 9-judge bench Answers: Q1-D, Q2-B, Q3-C, Q4-B, Q5-B
3. Supreme Court on Preventive Detention: Police Confession Insufficient Without Independent Material
Source: SC Observer, LiveLaw | Category: Indian Polity & Constitutional Law
What Happened?
In Mulla Afroz vs Union of India, the Supreme Court held that a police confession alone cannot justify preventive detention without independent corroborating material. The Court ordered the release of the appellant and imposed costs of ₹10 lakh on the detaining authority, reinforcing the safeguards under Article 22 against arbitrary detention.
Why is this IMPORTANT for CLAT?
- Article 22(4)–(7) codifies the constitutionally guaranteed procedural safeguards for preventive detention — a very high-yield CLAT topic
- The judgment reinforces that preventive detention laws are exceptions to ordinary arrest and must be used strictly; courts scrutinise the "subjective satisfaction" of detaining authorities
- Likely MCQ theme: grounds for preventive detention, maximum period without Advisory Board, landmark cases on Art. 22
Key Static Concepts to Link
- Article 22(4) — no preventive detention beyond 3 months without Advisory Board approval
- Article 22(5) — right to be informed of grounds and make representation
- Article 22(7) — Parliament may by law prescribe longer detention with Advisory Board
- National Security Act, 1980 — prominent preventive detention law at the Centre
- A.K. Roy vs Union of India (1982) — foundational case on preventive detention under Art. 22
Possible CLAT Questions
Q1. Under Article 22(4), a person detained under a preventive detention law cannot be held for more than how many months without the approval of an Advisory Board? A. 1 month B. 2 months C. 3 months D. 6 months Q2. Which right does Article 22(5) guarantee to a person detained under preventive detention? A. Right to legal representation B. Right to be informed of grounds and make a representation C. Right to bail D. Right to speedy trial Q3. In which landmark case did the Supreme Court establish that the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority is subject to judicial review on limited grounds? A. Maneka Gandhi vs Union of India B. A.K. Roy vs Union of India C. A.D.M. Jabalpur vs Shivkant Shukla D. Haradhan Saha vs State of W.B. Q4. The National Security Act (NSA), 1980 is a: A. State preventive detention law B. Central preventive detention law C. Judicial Order D. Constitutional Amendment Q5. Which of the following situations correctly exemplifies preventive detention as opposed to punitive detention? A. A person convicted for robbery is sentenced to 2 years imprisonment B. A person suspected of anti-national activities is detained without trial to prevent future offences C. A person charged with tax fraud appears before a magistrate and is remanded D. A person caught red-handed during theft is placed in police custody Answers: Q1-C, Q2-B, Q3-B, Q4-B, Q5-B
4. Cabinet Approves PM-KISAN Continuation: ₹3.15 Lakh Crore for 2026-31
Source: PIB, Rural Voice | Category: National Policies & Government Schemes
What Happened?
The Union Cabinet approved continuation of the Pradhan Mantri Kisan Samman Nidhi (PM-KISAN) scheme from 2026-27 to 2030-31, committing ₹3.15 lakh crore over five years. The scheme provides ₹6,000 per year to eligible landholding farmer families in three equal instalments of ₹2,000 each, transferred via Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) through Aadhaar-authenticated bank accounts. Since its launch in February 2019, the scheme has disbursed over ₹4.47 lakh crore to approximately 9.49 crore farmers.
Why is this IMPORTANT for CLAT?
- DBT-linked income support schemes have been tested in CLAT passages on federalism, centre-state relations, and welfare legislation
- Article 282 enables Central government to make grants in aid even for non-Union List subjects — the legal basis for such direct transfer schemes
- Likely MCQ theme: Concurrent vs State vs Union List subjects (agriculture is a State subject under Entry 14 of List II), Centre's power to fund schemes in State subjects
Key Static Concepts to Link
- Entry 14, List II (State List) — Agriculture
- Article 282 — grants by Centre for any public purpose even outside Union List
- Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) — Policy initiative since 2013, uses Aadhaar linkage
- PM-KISAN launched: 1 February 2019, under Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare
- Minimum Support Price (MSP) vs income support — conceptual distinction
Possible CLAT Questions
Q1. Agriculture is listed under which list of the Seventh Schedule of the Indian Constitution? A. Union List B. Concurrent List C. State List D. Residuary powers of Parliament Q2. Under PM-KISAN, what is the annual income support provided to eligible farmer families? A. ₹4,000 B. ₹5,000 C. ₹6,000 D. ₹8,000 Q3. PM-KISAN was launched in which year? A. 2015 B. 2017 C. 2018 D. 2019 Q4. Which Article of the Constitution provides for grants by the Central Government for any public purpose, including outside the Union List? A. Article 275 B. Article 280 C. Article 282 D. Article 293 Q5. The DBT mechanism in government transfers is primarily linked to which identity document for authentication? A. Passport B. PAN Card C. Aadhaar D. Voter ID Answers: Q1-C, Q2-C, Q3-D, Q4-C, Q5-C
5. GOBARdhan Scheme: India's National Unified Biogas Programme (₹23,731 Crore)
Source: PIB, Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Gas | Category: Environment, Climate, Energy
What Happened?
The Cabinet approved GOBARdhan (Galvanising Organic Bio-Agro Resources Dhan) as India's National Unified Scheme for Compressed Biogas (CBG) with an outlay of ₹23,731 crore for 2026-27 to 2035-36. Administered by the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas, the scheme mandates a 3-5% CBG blending obligation for city gas distributors, provides capital support of up to ₹2 crore per ton/day capacity, and sets pricing at ₹2,110 per MMBTU to make biogas economically viable.
Why is this IMPORTANT for CLAT?
- India's energy transition and biofuel policy — linking to the Biofuel Policy 2018, National Green Hydrogen Mission, and Panchamrit climate commitments under the Paris Agreement
- Circular economy principles (waste-to-energy) are an increasingly common CLAT comprehension passage theme
- Links to Article 48A (Directive Principle: environment protection) and Article 51A(g) (Fundamental Duty to protect environment)
Key Static Concepts to Link
- Article 48A (DPSP) — protection and improvement of environment
- Article 51A(g) — Fundamental Duty to protect environment and wildlife
- Biofuel Policy 2018 — mandates blending of biofuels
- Panchamrit targets — India's 2021 COP26 climate pledges
- Paris Agreement, 2015 — India is a signatory
Possible CLAT Questions
Q1. Article 48A of the Indian Constitution, which directs the State to protect the environment, is part of: A. Fundamental Rights B. Directive Principles of State Policy C. Fundamental Duties D. The Preamble Q2. GOBARdhan stands for: A. Government Organic Bio-Agricultural Resources Development and Harmonisation B. Galvanising Organic Bio-Agro Resources Dhan C. Green Organic Biomass Agricultural Renewable Dhan D. Generating Organic Biogas and Agricultural Resources Dhan Q3. GOBARdhan is administered by which Ministry? A. Ministry of New and Renewable Energy B. Ministry of Agriculture C. Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas D. Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change Q4. India's net-zero emissions target year is: A. 2050 B. 2060 C. 2070 D. 2080 Q5. Which of the following is India's Fundamental Duty relating to the environment under Article 51A? A. 51A(e) B. 51A(f) C. 51A(g) D. 51A(h) Answers: Q1-B, Q2-B, Q3-C, Q4-C, Q5-C
6. India at the 81st UN General Assembly: S. Jaishankar Addresses High-Level Week
Source: Telangana Today, MEA | Category: International Relations & Global Summits
What Happened?
External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar led India's delegation to the High-Level Week of the 81st UN General Assembly in New York, addressing the session on September 26, 2026. This year's UNGA theme is "Restoring trust, managing transformation: a United Nations that delivers for all." Jaishankar also participated in bilateral and plurilateral meetings on the sidelines, reaffirming India's commitment to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), reform of the UN Security Council, and multi-polar global order.
Why is this IMPORTANT for CLAT?
- UNGA, UNSC reform (India's UNSC permanent membership bid), and international organisations are staple CLAT current affairs topics
- Jaishankar's role as EAM under Article 77/78 of the Constitution (Council of Ministers, collective responsibility) links polity with external affairs
- Likely MCQ theme: UN structure, UNGA voting procedure (one nation one vote vs UNSC veto), India's foreign policy pillars
Key Static Concepts to Link
- UN Charter (1945) — principal organs: GA, SC, ECOSOC, ICJ, Trusteeship Council, Secretariat
- Article 19 UNGA — each member has one vote; budget decisions by 2/3 majority
- UNSC — 5 permanent members (P5) with veto; 10 rotating non-permanent members
- India's UNSC non-permanent membership stints — including 2021-22
- Article 253 of Indian Constitution — Parliament's power to implement international agreements
Possible CLAT Questions
Q1. The theme of the 81st UN General Assembly (2026) was: A. "Leaving no one behind: acting together for shared prosperity" B. "Restoring trust, managing transformation: a United Nations that delivers for all" C. "Building resilience through hope" D. "Delivering on the promise of human dignity" Q2. How many principal organs does the United Nations have? A. 4 B. 5 C. 6 D. 7 Q3. Which Article of the Indian Constitution empowers Parliament to make laws to implement India's obligations under international treaties? A. Article 249 B. Article 250 C. Article 253 D. Article 257 Q4. In the UN Security Council, a veto power rests with: A. All 15 members B. The 10 non-permanent members by 2/3 majority C. 5 permanent members only D. The UN Secretary-General Q5. The UN General Assembly operates on the principle of: A. Weighted voting based on GDP B. Proportional representation C. One nation, one vote D. Veto by founding members Answers: Q1-B, Q2-C, Q3-C, Q4-C, Q5-C
7. AFSPA Continued in Manipur, Nagaland, and Arunachal Pradesh
Source: Legacy IAS, Ministry of Home Affairs | Category: Indian Polity & Constitutional Law
What Happened?
The Central government extended the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958 (AFSPA) in parts of Manipur, Nagaland, and Arunachal Pradesh. The extension continues the designation of these areas as "Disturbed Areas" under the Act. The Supreme Court's 2016 judgment in EEVFAM vs Union of India held that the immunity under Section 6 of AFSPA is not absolute, and any case of excessive force or death by armed forces personnel can be judicially reviewed and prosecuted with central government sanction.
Why is this IMPORTANT for CLAT?
- AFSPA is one of the most controversially debated laws in Indian polity and a very frequent CLAT comprehension passage subject
- Section 6 of AFSPA provides protection from prosecution without prior sanction of the Central government — engages Art. 21 (right to life) directly
- Likely MCQ theme: definition of "Disturbed Area," which authority may declare it, Armed Forces powers under AFSPA, judicial oversight
Key Static Concepts to Link
- AFSPA, 1958 (as amended in 1972) — applies to "Disturbed Areas" in Northeast India and J&K
- Section 3 — Central or State government may declare "Disturbed Area"
- Section 4 — powers of armed forces: enter premises, arrest without warrant, use force
- Section 6 — prosecution protection without Central sanction
- EEVFAM vs Union of India (2016) — Supreme Court held no blanket immunity for excessive force
- Article 21 — Right to life and personal liberty
Possible CLAT Questions
Q1. AFSPA stands for: A. Armed Forces Special Powers Amendment B. Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act C. Army Forces Special Policing Act D. Armed Federal Security Powers Act Q2. AFSPA was originally enacted in: A. 1948 B. 1958 C. 1967 D. 1972 Q3. Under AFSPA, prosecution of an armed forces officer requires prior sanction from: A. State Government B. Supreme Court C. Central Government D. High Court Q4. The Supreme Court held in EEVFAM vs Union of India (2016) that AFSPA protection: A. Is absolute and cannot be reviewed B. Does not bar judicial review in cases of excessive force C. Applies only to the Army, not paramilitary D. Requires State High Court sanction for prosecution Q5. AFSPA can be invoked only in areas declared as: A. Emergency zones B. Conflict zones C. Disturbed Areas D. Protected Areas Answers: Q1-B, Q2-B, Q3-C, Q4-B, Q5-C
8. Supreme Court Questions Steep Medicine Markups; Reviews NPPA Powers
Source: Legacy IAS, LiveLaw | Category: Economy: Regulation & Financial Instruments
What Happened?
The Supreme Court questioned steep price markups on essential medicines, noting that National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority (NPPA) regulations under Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 mandate price control for scheduled medicines under the Drug Price Control Order (DPCO). The Court asked why a uniform 16% retailer margin cannot apply across all medicine formulations, raising concerns about regulatory enforcement and the constitutional right to affordable healthcare under Article 21.
Why is this IMPORTANT for CLAT?
- The NPPA and DPCO link the Essential Commodities Act (a concurrent list subject) with Article 21's expanded interpretation to include the right to health
- Pharmaceutical pricing regulation is a governance and economics topic frequently appearing in legal reasoning passages in CLAT
- Likely MCQ theme: authority of NPPA, distinction between scheduled and non-scheduled formulations, Essential Commodities Act framework
Key Static Concepts to Link
- Essential Commodities Act, 1955 — Section 3 empowers Central Government to control production, supply, and distribution of essential commodities
- Drug Price Control Order (DPCO), 2013 — current pricing framework; NPPA implements it
- NPPA — National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority (set up 1997, under Ministry of Chemicals & Fertilizers)
- Article 21 — Right to life (expanded to include right to health: Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity vs State of W.B.)
- Entry 19, Concurrent List — Drugs and poisons
Possible CLAT Questions
Q1. The NPPA (National Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority) operates under which Ministry? A. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare B. Ministry of Commerce and Industry C. Ministry of Chemicals and Fertilizers D. Ministry of Finance Q2. The Drug Price Control Order (DPCO) derives its authority from: A. Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 B. Essential Commodities Act, 1955 C. Competition Act, 2002 D. Consumer Protection Act, 2019 Q3. 'Drugs' appear on which List of the Seventh Schedule of the Constitution? A. Union List B. State List C. Concurrent List D. Residuary List Q4. The right to health has been judicially recognised as part of which Fundamental Right? A. Article 19(1)(a) B. Article 21 C. Article 14 D. Article 25 Q5. The Essential Commodities Act, 1955 was enacted by Parliament primarily under powers derived from: A. State List Entry 26 B. Concurrent List Entry 33 C. Union List Entry 61 D. Residuary powers under Article 248 Answers: Q1-C, Q2-B, Q3-C, Q4-B, Q5-B
9. India Launches Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS) Mid-2026: Climate Regulation Update
Source: Climate Action Tracker | Category: Environment, Climate, Energy
What Happened?
India's Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS) launched mid-2026, applying emissions-intensity targets to 13 energy-intensive industrial sectors. India has also updated its Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) under the Paris Agreement, committing to 60% non-fossil energy capacity by 2035. Current renewable capacity stands at approximately 256 GW (49% of total installed capacity). India's net-zero target remains 2070. Meanwhile, the PM E-DERIVE scheme replaced FAME II as the key electric vehicle incentive policy.
Why is this IMPORTANT for CLAT?
- CCTS introduces a market mechanism for carbon reduction — analogous to international cap-and-trade systems — and its regulatory framework links to environmental law and economic regulation
- India's NDC update under Article 4 of the Paris Agreement is critical for international law and environmental law passages in CLAT
- Likely MCQ themes: Paris Agreement structure, India's NDCs, Energy Conservation Act 2022, FAME scheme, distinction between adaptation and mitigation
Key Static Concepts to Link
- Paris Agreement, 2015 — Article 4: NDCs to be submitted every 5 years, principle of Common But Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities (CBDR-RC)
- Energy Conservation (Amendment) Act, 2022 — created framework for carbon markets in India
- National Action Plan on Climate Change (NAPCC) — 8 missions including National Solar Mission
- Panchamrit (5 elements of India's climate commitment announced at COP26, 2021)
- FAME II → PM E-DERIVE: Electric Vehicle incentive policy transition
Possible CLAT Questions
Q1. India launched the Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS) under which Act? A. Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 B. Energy Conservation (Amendment) Act, 2022 C. Air (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 D. National Green Tribunal Act, 2010 Q2. India's updated NDC commits to achieving what percentage of non-fossil energy capacity by 2035? A. 50% B. 55% C. 60% D. 70% Q3. India's net-zero emissions target year is: A. 2050 B. 2060 C. 2070 D. 2080 Q4. The principle 'Common But Differentiated Responsibilities' (CBDR) is most closely associated with: A. Universal Declaration of Human Rights B. Kyoto Protocol and Paris Agreement C. Convention on Biological Diversity D. Basel Convention Q5. Which EV policy replaced the FAME II scheme in 2026? A. National Electric Mobility Mission Plan (NEMMP) B. PM EV Initiative C. PM E-DERIVE D. FAME III Answers: Q1-B, Q2-C, Q3-C, Q4-B, Q5-C
10. BNS Section 69 Clarified: Promise to Marry Withdrawn Due to Family Objection Not an Offence
Source: SC Observer, LiveLaw | Category: Indian Polity & Constitutional Law
What Happened?
The Supreme Court in Kunal Rameshbhai Kalyani vs State of Gujarat clarified the scope of Section 69 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, which criminalises sexual intercourse on a deceitful promise of marriage. The Court held that a promise to marry that is genuinely later withdrawn due to family opposition — without initial deceitful intent — does not constitute the offence under Section 69. The judgment draws a crucial distinction between a false promise made at the outset (with intent to deceive) and a promise that later becomes impossible to keep for genuine reasons.
Why is this IMPORTANT for CLAT?
- The BNS 2023 replaced the Indian Penal Code (IPC) 1860 — a major legislative reform that will feature prominently in CLAT legal reasoning sections
- Section 69 BNS (analogous to IPC provisions expanded) represents criminal law's interaction with personal autonomy and consent
- Likely MCQ theme: BNS vs IPC comparative provisions, ingredients of deception under criminal law, recent SC judgments on consent
Key Static Concepts to Link
- Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 — replaces IPC, 1860; came into force July 1, 2024
- Section 69 BNS — intercourse by deceitful means or false promise of marriage
- Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 — replaces CrPC, 1973
- Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam (BSA), 2023 — replaces Indian Evidence Act, 1872
- Uday vs State of Karnataka — SC's earlier judgment drawing the distinction on consent and false promise
Possible CLAT Questions
Q1. The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023 replaced which law? A. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 B. Indian Evidence Act, 1872 C. Indian Penal Code, 1860 D. Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Q2. The BNS came into force on: A. January 1, 2024 B. April 1, 2024 C. July 1, 2024 D. October 1, 2024 Q3. Section 69 of the BNS deals with: A. Murder B. Sedition C. Sexual intercourse by deceitful means or false promise of marriage D. Theft Q4. Which new legislation replaced the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973? A. Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita B. Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita C. Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam D. Bharatiya Dand Sanhita Q5. The three new criminal laws collectively (BNS, BNSS, BSA) are aimed at replacing how many pre-existing laws? A. 2 B. 3 C. 4 D. 5 Answers: Q1-C, Q2-C, Q3-C, Q4-B, Q5-B
11. Maharashtra Drought: Legal Framework under Disaster Management Act 2005
Source: Legacy IAS | Category: National Policies & Government Schemes
What Happened?
The Maharashtra government declared drought in 265 of its 358 talukas following below-normal rainfall. Under the Disaster Management Act, 2005, drought is a notified disaster qualifying for State Disaster Response Fund (SDRF) assistance from the Centre. The Centre-State cost sharing ratio for the SDRF is 75:25 (75% from Centre, 25% from States). This triggers the constitutional and legal machinery for disaster relief under the Concurrent List and the National Disaster Management Authority's guidelines.
Why is this IMPORTANT for CLAT?
- Disaster Management Act 2005 created the NDMA, SDMAs, and DDMAs (three-tier structure) — a commonly tested statutory body in CLAT
- The Centre-State fiscal relationship in disaster relief engages Art. 280 (Finance Commission) and the principles of cooperative federalism
- Likely MCQ theme: NDMA structure and powers, Finance Commission's role in SDRF, constitutional basis of disaster management
Key Static Concepts to Link
- Disaster Management Act, 2005 — Sections 3 and 14: NDMA (National Disaster Management Authority) chaired by PM; SDMA (State) chaired by CM
- NDRF (National Disaster Response Fund) — managed by Centre; SDRF (State) — 75:25 Centre-State sharing
- Finance Commission — recommends SDRF allocations (Article 280)
- Entry 23, Concurrent List — Social security and insurance
- Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030 — India is a signatory
Possible CLAT Questions
Q1. Who chairs the National Disaster Management Authority (NDMA)? A. Union Home Minister B. Prime Minister of India C. Cabinet Secretary D. Chief Justice of India Q2. The SDRF (State Disaster Response Fund) is shared between Centre and States in the ratio of: A. 50:50 B. 60:40 C. 70:30 D. 75:25 Q3. The Disaster Management Act was enacted in which year? A. 2001 B. 2003 C. 2005 D. 2008 Q4. The international framework guiding disaster risk reduction for 2015-2030 is: A. Kyoto Protocol B. Yokohama Strategy C. Sendai Framework D. Hyogo Framework Q5. Which constitutional body recommends SDRF allocations to States? A. National Disaster Management Authority B. Planning Commission C. Finance Commission D. Inter-State Council Answers: Q1-B, Q2-D, Q3-C, Q4-C, Q5-C
12. International Day of Older Persons (October 1) & Gandhi Jayanti (October 2)
Source: Vajiramandravi, PIB | Category: Sports, Awards, Books, Important Days
What Happened?
October 1 is observed as the International Day of Older Persons (IDOP), established by the UN General Assembly through Resolution 45/106 in 1990. It highlights the contributions of elderly people and raises awareness about challenges of ageing. October 2 is Gandhi Jayanti, commemorating the birth anniversary of Mahatma Gandhi (born 1869), also observed globally as the International Day of Non-Violence (UN Resolution 61/271, 2007). The day upholds Gandhian principles of Ahimsa and Satyagraha.
Why is this IMPORTANT for CLAT?
- Gandhi Jayanti and International Day of Non-Violence are standard CLAT GK questions, especially the UN resolutions establishing them
- IDOP connects to elderly rights legislation — Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (and 2019 amendment)
- Likely MCQ theme: UN resolutions, Gandhian philosophy, important days and their legal/international backing
Key Static Concepts to Link
- UN Resolution 45/106 (1990) — established International Day of Older Persons
- UN Resolution 61/271 (2007) — established International Day of Non-Violence (Oct 2)
- Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 — provides maintenance obligations on children/legal heirs
- Mahatma Gandhi — born October 2, 1869, in Porbandar, Gujarat
- National Commission for Senior Citizens — set up under the 2007 Act
Possible CLAT Questions
Q1. The International Day of Non-Violence is observed on: A. September 21 B. October 1 C. October 2 D. November 11 Q2. Through which UN Resolution was Gandhi Jayanti declared the International Day of Non-Violence? A. UN Resolution 45/106 B. UN Resolution 61/271 C. UN Resolution 44/25 D. UN Resolution 217A Q3. The Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act was enacted in: A. 2002 B. 2005 C. 2007 D. 2010 Q4. October 1 is observed globally as: A. World Habitat Day B. International Coffee Day and International Day of Older Persons C. World Animal Day D. World Peace Day Q5. Mahatma Gandhi was born in which city? A. Ahmedabad B. Rajkot C. Porbandar D. Surat Answers: Q1-C, Q2-B, Q3-C, Q4-B, Q5-C
📊 Quick Revision Snapshot
| # | Topic | Key Fact | CLAT Category |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Election Commission Appointment Law | SC refers Dr. Jaya Thakur case to Constitution Bench under Art. 145(3); 2023 Act challenged | Indian Polity & Constitutional Law |
| 2 | J&K Statehood Restoration | Requires Parliament to amend J&K Reorganisation Act 2019 under Articles 3 & 4; SC 2023 upheld abrogation of Art. 370 | Indian Polity & Constitutional Law |
| 3 | Preventive Detention — SC Ruling | Police confession alone insufficient; SC awards ₹10L costs; Art. 22(4)–(7) safeguards reinforced | Indian Polity & Constitutional Law |
| 4 | PM-KISAN Extended (2026–31) | ₹3.15 lakh crore; ₹6,000/year to ~9.49 crore farmers via DBT; agriculture is State List Entry 14 | National Policies & Government Schemes |
| 5 | GOBARdhan Biogas Scheme | ₹23,731 crore (2026–35); Ministry of Petroleum; 3–5% CBG blending mandate; waste-to-energy | Environment, Climate, Energy |
| 6 | India at 81st UNGA | EAM Jaishankar addressed High-Level Week; Theme: "Restoring trust, managing transformation…" | International Relations & Global Summits |
| 7 | AFSPA Extended | Continued in Manipur, Nagaland, Arunachal Pradesh; EEVFAM case (2016) — no blanket immunity | Indian Polity & Constitutional Law |
| 8 | Essential Medicine Pricing | SC questions steep markups on NPPA-regulated drugs; DPCO under Essential Commodities Act 1955 | Economy: Regulation & Financial Instruments |
| 9 | Carbon Credit Trading Scheme (CCTS) | Launched mid-2026; 13 sectors; under Energy Conservation Amendment Act 2022; NDC updated: 60% non-fossil by 2035 | Environment, Climate, Energy |
| 10 | BNS Section 69 Clarified | Family opposition-based withdrawal of marriage promise ≠ deception; BNS replaced IPC (July 1, 2024) | Indian Polity & Constitutional Law |
| 11 | Maharashtra Drought | 265/358 talukas declared drought; Disaster Management Act 2005; NDRF/SDRF: 75:25 Centre-State | National Policies & Government Schemes |
| 12 | Important Days: Oct 1 & Oct 2 | IDOP (UN Res. 45/106); Gandhi Jayanti + Intl Day of Non-Violence (UN Res. 61/271, 2007) | Sports, Awards, Books, Important Days |
📌 Prepared by CLATians Editorial Desk | For CLAT 2027 & CLAT 2028 Preparation | Based on The Hindu, Indian Express, Times of India, PIB, ANI
Start Your CLAT Journey with CLATians
Expert coaching, 150+ mock tests, and personalized mentorship. Join 5000+ successful students.